The Magazine for Developers of Open Communication, Industrial, and Rugged Systems
ARTICLES
PRODUCTS
NEWSWIRE
VENDORS
E-LETTER
E-CAST SCHEDULE
Home > News >
More CompactPCI and AdvancedTCA News
Magazine >

About the Magazine
Editorial Topics
Free Subscription
Search Articles
Search Products
Contact Information
Columns

Editor's Foreword
by Joe Pavlat
Software Corner
Specification Corner
Technology in Europe
Technology Update
Market Studies
Tutorial
Departments

What is CompactPCI?
What is AdvancedTCA?
Webcasts

Upcoming E-casts
Archived E-casts
Submissions

Submit a Press Release
Submit a New Product
Submit an Article for Review
Vendors/Sponsors

Preferred Vendors
Upcoming Issue
Advertise
Editorial Calendar
Media Kits






 Industry News

4G Or Not 4G, That Is The Question

2 months 5 days ago

Few things trigger more discussion than terms and definitions. On one hand, you have a group of professionals that believe that the usage of a term has to be defined strictly in technical terms, and if a technology doesn’t meet the definition to 100%, it is non-compliant. Don’t say it is 4G, if it is not compliant to ITU’s definition, they claim.

The other camp, and I belong to this group, simply says that the new generation of technology is defined by both technical and commercial means. The 4th generation of mobile infrastructure is underway. LTE has a completely new air interface and a completely new core. In practice, the backhaul segment is also re-engineered. This is a huge new investment by mobile operators and the consumers have to buy new handheld devices. A new page in the history book of mobile infrastructure is being turned. I call that 4G.

The debate continues though. You can make your opinion heard here. Or you can consider contributing to the wikipedia definition of 4G.

Source:  Xelerated Xpress